Saturday, October 10, 2009

不解呀不解...

向來熱愛戰爭的諾貝爾和平獎委員會最喜獎勵戰爭,最為人津津樂道的莫過於十幾年前為兩位打了幾十年的頒發和平獎!有道是盛情難卻,既然他兩位老兄幾十年來幹的備受鼓勵,難怪該地區打到今時今日、自頒獎十多年以來從未真正和平過...若說表揚奧芭瑪對阿富汗增兵萬人符合諾貝爾和平獎精神當然容易明白,不過看完報導後卻令人更加疑惑...


奧芭馬對獲諾和平獎感驚訝

文中云"挪威諾貝爾委員會周五宣布,奧芭馬獲頒今屆和平獎,因為他當選美國總統以來,增強國際外交及不同國家的合作,應對不同的挑戰..."
莫非...
























委員會意指奧巴瑪令帝國嚴重衰弱、不得不看其他國家面色?

6 comments:

  1. 原來有盡力就得,唔洗有結果。

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr. Dodderer please forgive me for being a fool. I'm not here to comment your blog post, but just to ask you some questions about college.

    I'm currently a form seven student who wants to major in social science (either sociology or psychology) in college. Now I'm in a dilemma - HKU or CU? According to what I heard from people, CU outperforms HKU in terms of resources, research and faculty when it comes to social science. But personally I have a slight obsession over HKU, perhaps because of its traditions and history. (And the reputation of HKU appeals to employers? Ok so apparently the obsession is all about superficiality.) Another good thing about HKU is that I only have to declare a major in the second year. This is good for me since I'm not completely sure which field of social science I myself am interested in even though it seems like sociology intrigues me slightly more than psychology.

    Mr. Dodderer, I would be very glad if you can just give me some advice that prompts me to think... Not necessarily tell me how to decide, or which to choose. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. XYZ兄:好長既英文...

    利益申報,我係中大人。

    講人脈、出路,即使有人話某些機構藍大好、帝資機構中大強一點,個人經驗係差唔多(當然唔同公司真係有少少分別,但),差異細到可以話微不足道;

    講Social Science的確大多數(唔係全部)中大較強,如果你已肯定想入既major就可直選中大,若有點猶豫既,藍大遲一年先揀就起到作用。

    ReplyDelete
  4. 我覺得與其將個獎頒比奧巴馬,不如索性頒比美國人,因為係佢地選奧巴馬.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 諾貝爾和平獎根本是為英美服務,看他們怕了英國而不敢給甘地便知道有多權威了!

    ReplyDelete
  6. 這告訴世人,只要美國總統什麼都不做,世界就會和平.

    ReplyDelete